About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010

On November 18, the leaders of the five states which border the Caspian met in Baku, for one of their regular attempts to thrash out an agreement on the Caspian’s status. The presidents of Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Russia last met to discuss their shared sea in 2007.

Since then, the issue of whether the Caspian really is a sea or a lake – a decision which would affect the ownership of the Caspian’s huge gas and oil reserves has gone nowhere, whilst development of undersea energy stocks has continued apace. The latest meeting looks unlikely to change these dynamics. Instead of a comprehensive deal on the status of the Caspian, the issue of delimiting the sea has been put off once again.

Security issues were also high on the agenda. Threats have often been rolled out to explain the littoral states’ cautious naval build-up, but the resources and the reality are seriously mismatched. Analyst Joshua Kucera draws attention to stories of piracy and armed poachers on the Caspian (Eurasianet, November 11), but this is hardly a reason to justify the hardware of the five Caspian navies.

Kazakhstan is negotiating to buy corvettes armed with formidable Exocet anti-ship missiles (Eurasianet, June 23), whilst Russia’s Caspian Flotilla is being boosted with new frigates (News.az, November 2) and Azerbaijan is strengthening its radar and command-and-control systems. Even Turkmenistan is trying to increase its naval profile (Jamestown Foundation, February 16).

Iran’s naval aspirations, framed by its stubborn and isolated position on Caspian delimitation, are the elephant in the room. Earlier this year, Iran announced that it was launching its first destroyer in the Caspian, capable of electronic warfare, anti-submarine and anti-aircraft attacks – hardly required to stop sturgeon poachers (Trend.az, February 19). Moscow and Tehran are uneasy about each others’ naval presence, but have so far presented a united front to prevent their biggest fear – a greater role in the Caspian for the US or NATO (Eurasianet, November 19). These fears presumably informed the security agreement which emerged from the Baku summit.

Agreeing on a division of the Caspian Sea has been on the agenda for years (the first official summit of littoral states was in 2002), but Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was only able to report progress towards that goal, acknowledging that “the negotiation process is not progressing very fast” (Kremlin.ru, November 18).

However on the actual issue of delimiting the Caspian, President Medvedev offered a sign that Iran – which claims that the Caspian should be divided into five equal shares – has finally conceded its position to the other four littoral states. The Russian leader said that within the next three months, each country’s responsible agency would agree on “the national maritime zones, based on sea borders of 24 or 25 miles off the coast” (Kremlin.ru, November 18).

In other words, Iran will lose out in the carve-up of oil and gas reserves, receiving a share based on its smaller coastline. However, Moscow made efforts to keep Tehran happy, with some not-so-subtle hints that a Trans-Caspian gas pipeline (TCP), linking Azerbaijan with Turkmenistan and backed by the EU and US, was impermissible. President Medvedev stated that no state could “take unilateral steps that could disrupt the existing balance or frustrate the efforts toward the new convention….We must also preserve [the Caspian’s] unique environment”.

In other words, a TCP is environmentally and legally prohibited. This is music to Iran’s ears which, like Russia, opposes any effort to send Caspian energy reserves to global markets through alternative routes.

However, Turkmenistan offered up a defiant note, in line with its recent prickly relationship with Moscow, stating that a pipeline along the Caspian seabed needs only the approval of the countries involved (Turkmenistan.ru, November 18). Turkmen plans to join the EU’s Nabucco project, bringing Caspian gas to Europe, are apparently still going ahead, despite some outstanding disputes with Baku (Bloomberg, November 19). Ashgabat’s confident support of a TCP contradicts the agreements made at the previous littoral summit in 2007 (RFE/RL, November 19), at which participants agreed that seabed pipelines needed the consent of all five states.

Turkmenistan’s commitment to this pipeline may shake up the cautious world of Caspian diplomacy. Moscow is now aware that dragging out the question of the Caspian’s legal status, whilst beneficial in the short term (by allowing each state to quietly get on with developing resources in undisputed coastal zones), has backfired by undermining Russian and Iranian plans to stall a TCP through a legally agreed regime for the Caspian. This urgent need to delimit the Caspian may explain President Medvedev’s insistence that all five littoral states must meet more regularly, starting next year in Russia.

Ironically, the new security pact – created as a result of mutual suspicion between Russia and Iran – could deprive both of the military freedom to intimidate Turkmenistan or Azerbaijan if construction of a TCP goes ahead. Much is still made of a 2001 incident in which Iranian gunboats chased off BP research vessels exploring Azerbaijan’s sector of the sea. But the stronger security environment now in the Caspian, thanks to Moscow and Tehran’s desire to limit each others’ naval clout, will make future confrontations much more unlikely. Russo-Iranian competition could permanently undermine their mutual interests in closing off the Caspian. Good news for Nabucco.



"Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010" | 20 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

by Arumanz on Fri May 09, 2014 12:14 pm
Semakin harus kita mengetahui bahwa artikel yang dirilis disini Website [sites.miis.edu] memang terkesan luar biasa dan cenderung mencerahkan.



by Arumanz on Fri May 09, 2014 12:16 pm
Semakin harus kita mengetahui bahwa artikel yang dirilis disini Website [sites.miis.edu] memang terkesan luar biasa dan cenderung mencerahkan.



by Arumanz on Fri May 09, 2014 12:16 pm
Semakin harus kita mengetahui bahwa artikel yang dirilis disini <a href="http://sites.miis.edu/ciptojunaedy1/"title='"http://sites.miis.edu/ciptojunaedy1/"'> Website</a> [sites.miis.edu] memang terkesan luar biasa dan cenderung mencerahkan.



by farz on Thu May 22, 2014 7:50 am
Indonesian furniture [fb.me] http://www.jeparaproduction.com/ [www.jeparaproduction.com] www.rit.edu/kgcoe/mechanical/sel/node/2457 [www.rit.edu]



by Anonymous on Mon Jul 14, 2014 8:03 am



by sdsdsds on Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:51 am
vizag beach photos [www.hivizag.com]



by sdsdsds on Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:51 am
vizag beach photos [www.hivizag.com]



by clothing manufa on Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:34 am
Semakin harus kita mengetahui bahwa artikel yang dirilis disini Website [sites.miis.edu] memang terkesan luar biasa dan cenderung mencerahkan. clothing manufacturer [www.china-clothing-manufacturer.net]



by Packers and Movers India on Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:58 pm
Once you have employed their services; they take the liability of your useful products on their neck place and execute them to great top great quality. http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-bangalore/



by Top Packers and Movers on Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:58 pm



by Packers and Movers India on Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:14 pm
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about -
Packers and Movers Chennai @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-chennai/
Packers and Movers Mumbai @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai/
Packers and Movers Bangalore @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-bangalore/
Packers and Movers Delhi @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-delhi/



by Packers and Movers India on Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:14 pm
This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.
Packers and Movers Gurgaon @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-gurgaon/
Packers and Movers Pune @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-pune/
Packers and Movers Noida @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-noida/
Packers and Movers Hyderabad @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad/



by Packers and Movers India on Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:15 pm
Thanks for all your information, Website is very nice and informative content.
Packers and Movers Thane @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-thane/
Packers and Movers Navi Mumbai @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-navimumbai/
Packers and Movers Ghaziabad @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-ghaziabad/
Packers and Movers Faridabad @
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-faridabad/



by Lowongan on Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:17 pm
nice site .. I love u full iran



by [url=http://goo.gl/M9vWgP]Lowongan Kerja Terbaru[/url] on Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:17 pm
Nice TQ :)
[url=http://goo.gl/M9vWgP]Lowongan Kerja Terbaru[/url]
Loker [goo.gl]
[link=http://goo.gl/M9vWgP]Lowongan[/link]
"Loker Terbaru":http://goo.gl/Ip2ZgC



by sushilkr on Mon May 30, 2016 8:20 am
Packers and Movers Hyderabad go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad/
Packers and Movers Pune go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-pune/
Packers and Movers Bangalore go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-bangalore/



by Packers and Movers Gurgaon on Mon May 30, 2016 8:28 am

Packers and Movers Gurgaon go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-gurgaon/
Packers and Movers in Delhi go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-delhi/
Packers and Movers Mumbai go to:-
http://www.movers5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai/



by Packers and Movers in Gurgaon on Mon May 30, 2016 8:35 am

Packers and Movers in Gurgaon go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-gurgaon.html
Packers and Movers in Pune go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-pune.html
Packers and Movers in Bangalore go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-bangalore.html
Packers and Movers in Hyderabad go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad.html
Packers and Movers in Delhi go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-delhi.html
Packers and Movers Mumbai go to:-
http://www.moveby5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai.html



by rohan rey on Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:33 am
we love it to visit this site, many useful information we can get from here, we have blog about jual spirulina [www.organik100.com] elken spirulina [www.organik100.com] kubah masjid [www.sidoharind.co.id] jasa seo medan [genius.com] rohan , thank you.



by 41C) *F8JA .2'F'* ('DE/JF) 'DEFH1) on Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:37 am

E$33) 5AH) 'DE/JF) 41C) *F8JA .2'F'* H:3JD .2'F'* ('DE/JF) 'DEFH1) HEC'A-) -41'* ('DE/JF) 'DEFH1) 'D41C) D/JG' *.55 AI FBD 'D9A4 ('DE/JF) 'DDEFH1) HEC'A-) 'D-41'* H:3JD 'D.2'F'* ('DE/JF) 'DEFH1)
http://www.atar-almadinah.com/khasil.html 41C) *F8JA .2'F'* ('DE/JF) 'DEFH1)



PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook